Guardrails For Publishers In The AI Age
While AI-powered tools promise efficiencies and opportunities, they also introduce uncertainty around intellectual property, authorship, and transparency. In an era where large language models (LLMs) are transforming the way content is created, consumed, and repurposed, academic and professional publishers are facing a critical inflection point.
A new partnership between PublishOne and Copyleaks aims to offer a first-of-its-kind response to these challenges: an integrated publishing workflow that not only streamlines content creation and review but also safeguards proprietary material from unlicensed use by generative AI systems.
“LLMs don’t recognize copyright like humans do,” says Emily Burnett, Marketing Manager at Copyleaks. “They can’t distinguish between public and private domain content. That raises serious concerns about unauthorized use and broader implications for IP protection.”
The risks are real and emerging fast
GenAI has matured faster than policy, regulation, or even institutional understanding can keep up with. In academic publishing, that disconnect is becoming harder to ignore.
From unintentional plagiarism to full-scale IP infringement, publishers are now seeing the downstream effects of having their proprietary content used, often unknowingly, to train Large Language Models (LLMs). These models routinely scrape the public web, ingesting vast amounts of material with no regard for ownership or permission.
“This is such an emerging problem that people really don’t know what to do,” says Emily. “We’re seeing a lot of fair use trials coming up, like the Thomson Reuters case, where models have been trained on protected data without consent. It’s no longer hypothetical.”
Limited visibility, limited control
Without tools like Copyleaks, publishers have little to no visibility over how their content is used or misused. Most existing detection technologies provide binary yes/no answers, lacking the transparency necessary to make informed editorial or legal decisions.
This is where Copyleaks stands out. By embedding its detection technology directly into editorial workflows, such as through its PublishOne integration, Copyleaks offers real-time alerts, threshold-based analysis, and explainable insights into how AI-generated content interacts with proprietary material.
“We don’t just say, ‘this is AI,’” explains Emily. “We show you exactly why it’s flagged, which phrases are commonly used by LLMs, and even if that AI content has already been published elsewhere.”
This level of forensic transparency is particularly valuable in academic publishing, where provenance and originality are fundamental. Publishers can set their own thresholds, in line with internal AI policies, and receive live updates that help them stay compliant, without slowing down editorial processes.
The value of an integrated, adaptive system
For publishers managing hundreds or thousands of manuscripts and external contributors, this kind of integration is more than a convenience: it’s essential.
The partnership with PublishOne is a next-level integration, embedding Copyleaks into the core of content workflows. From manuscript submission to peer review and final copy editing, publishers will soon have the ability to automatically flag and analyze AI-generated content in context, across every step of the journey.
This creates a powerful governance layer, one that aligns with the fast-moving, nuanced reality of modern academic publishing. “We’re not here to tell you what to do,” explains Emily. “We’re here to give you the data you need to make informed decisions, enforce your own AI policies, and do so transparently.”
Trust-building in a generative world
Although this partnership is still in its early stages, it marks a broader shift toward the more thoughtful and more responsible use of AI in publishing. Instead of avoiding or banning AI entirely, Copyleaks and PublishOne are working to develop tools that enable publishers to safely leverage AI.
By enabling organizations to understand, monitor, and govern the use of AI within their own environments, this collaboration helps reinforce both legal compliance and academic integrity —two vital values for the future of publishing.
As Emily puts it, “We don’t know the long-term implications of AI yet. But we do know that the legal and ethical landscape is changing. Our goal is to make sure publishers aren’t blind sided, and can move forward with clarity and confidence.”
Learn more at https://copyleaks.com/
Blogs